The degree to which it will take a curve at high speed depends much on the smoothness of the pavement. Who else but Car Life (or R&T) would even ask these questions? I’m trying to imagine a Thunderbird with a three-on-the-tree and armstrong steering. CL duly noted than manual steering was not available. The steering was quick, but not surprisingly, lacking in feel. All those long overhangs are not exactly a good recipe for handling: “ causes handling around curves at higher velocities to be somewhat uncertain.” The soft springs and “ wishy-washy shock absorbers” play their part too, but CL notes that a set of stiffer aftermarket shocks can go some distance to improving that. Despite its 205″ length, it sits on a rather short 113″ wheelbase, 1″ less than a Comet’s. It’s heavy, weighing almost as much as a larger Cadillac. But due to the Thunderbird’s very high resale value, the actual cost of ownership wasn’t quite as hard to come by as it might seem at first jealous glance.ĬL points out that anyone concerned about fuel mileage probably isn’t really qualified to be in the market for a Thunderbird. Of course, all this attention didn’t come cheap, between its 11 mpg thirst and almost $6,000 price ($60k adjusted to 2022). “… you soon feel all eyes upon you…sometimes downright jealously“. You probably won’t be surprised at their conclusion. Car Life tested one to see if it drove as well as it turned heads. And if one really wanted to be seen, then the convertible version was even more magnetic. It was the eminent car to be seen in it turned heads like no other, even “in car blase Southern California”. This review puts the Thunderbird in proper context as “The supreme status symbol of the younger set”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |